Arnaud Develay (France) speech at the Global Conference on Multipolarity
Arnaud Develay (France) – an international human rights lawyer, member of the Washington State Bar (USA) and the Paris Bar (France).
THE GREAT POLARITY INVERSION
Introduction
We shall not inasmuch inquire into the theosophical nature of the period initiated with the so-called Plague as examine how the roll-out of the Great Reset operation of March 2020 managed to surf on a wave of of carefully-laid mass-hypnosis which in turn allowed for the destruction of the constitutional order in much of the Collective West.
Indeed, only States which retained antibodies against the emerging dystopia owing to their own recent experience with totalitarianism have managed to ride the wave of totalitarianism that has descended onto the West.
1. COVID 19: The Great Accelerator
The historical sequence which started in March 2020 represents the final step of a process of deconstruction initiated in the late 1960s. During that period, the West underwent a radical transformation which set out to deconstruct every pillar of traditional life as western societies had known for millennia. This project was carried out through the systematic application of social engineering measures originally conceived by the School of Frankfurt only to be accelerated by the so-called tenants of the French Theory such as FOUCAULT, ALTHUSSER and DERRIDA. These individuals benefitted from support from intelligence agencies as they slowly but surely first set out to conquer the realm of academia (starting in BERKELEY).
Throughout the next 50 years, this relentless and pernicious assault on what had been anthropological constants laid the ground for a complete anthropological eradication of what had made the Western Man resilient in the face of threats and challenges to his world view owing to his attachment to empiricism and rationality. The assault was even made more brutal owing to the relatively short period during which this happened.
The combined rise of aggressive feminism, mass immigration, institutional abortion, divorce and self-hatred was fueled by the corporate endorsement of such ideologies which the Left then promptly embraced as substitutes for its own forsaking of the working class.
On a spiritual level, the reform of Vatican II paved the way for the advent of the secular “human rights” ideology. This departure from tradition allowed for subversive elements to penetrate the ecclesiastical institutions and turn them into compliant appendixes of those advocating for a “liquid” society: a spiritual wasteland whereupon Man has no history…and so no destiny. This atomization process was further characterized by a period of frantic consumerism. The Market became the Ultimate Arbiter of the Agora. In this context, mercantile concerns slowly replaced the State’s sacred duty to preserve the interests of its constituency. Meritocracy was abandoned. Sycophancy was promoted. So-called experts invested the realm of public discourse. Charlatanism and false idols became the new High-Priests of corporate interests. This descent into civilizational oblivion was greatly facilitated by the concentration of media in a few hands. The media achieved to manipulate public perception of reality at the expense of sound empiricism. The verticality of old made room for the equivalency of opinions whereupon everyone was henceforth deemed to be an authority on all topics in the name of “tolerance” and “free speech”.
All of the above made it easy to then subjugate the remnants of a constitutional order in the name of so-called progress and later so-called “science”.
2. 1990-2020: The Great Polarity Inversion
But then, there were those who would not conform. Once dissipated the lure and sirens of unabated “freedom” through abundance, there arose those having lived in the former totalitarian realm of the Communist bloc who came to question the ideology of the End of History.
In those lands, Christianity had played a significant role in keeping the populations hopeful for the day which would see the tyrannical yoke of the Nomenklatura shatter under the weight of its own internal promethean contradictions.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn had long embodied these longings when in 1978, he was already warning the world that “the grass was not necessarily greener on the other side of the fence”.
In Poland, the former leader of the Solidarity Movement himself came to express his own disillusions with Western gnostic thought of what was meant by “progressivism”. He recalled the old injunctions of his youth when the western establishment castigated him for deviationist thoughts about same sex marriages and the disastrous civilizational effect of the migrant onslaught on Europe and he promptly exercised self-repentance by advocating for the “reduction of the Russian people down to 50 millions.”
This emerging polarity inversion can also be witnessed as the Brussels Politburo attempted to take control over national courts or impose sanctions against those having deemed to have passed legislation preventing Open Society organizations to engage in subversive activity in countrries such as Hungary.
In the Russian Federation, the constitutional referendum of August 2020 reestablished the primacy of Russian constitutional law over international legislations whose aims are to call into question the cultural and spiritual foundation of Orthodoxy.
This paved the way for Russia to engage in a comprehenside review of its international obligations within the context of Western-imposed ideological diktats which had no substance left in the wake of the admissions uttered by frmer French and German leaders bearing on the ir willingness to ignite a conflict in Ukraine.
Clearly, in those countries the defense mechanisms needed to preserve society against the leviathan of dissolution were shown to still be functioning and the Moloch of Davos in turn brought to show its true face for in order to succeed with its final push for total control over the souls and bodies of those living under its sway does not suffer the very existence of an alternative to its dystopian agenda.
The emergence of this renewed dichotomy will over time reaffirm the validity of age-old principles of rooted interdependence and rejection of materialism as an end unto itself. Even if the false god of Davos initially succeed in coercing its population to comply in becoming tenants of what Slobodan Despot has referred to as an electronic prison, this attempt has already lost its momentum and the intuitive power of the masses is slowly reasserting itself owing to the very tools upon which the Babylonian Order has relied on for so long.
Conclusion
In its attempt to maintain control over the financial system, the architects of the Great Reset have been forced to move forward and activate the COVID 19 narrative earlier than what had been initially envisioned.
In doing so, the DAVOS men gravely underestimated the need to wait until the time was ripe to achieve corrupting the traditional principles shared by populations who once lived under Communist dystopia as had been done successfully over the last 50 years in the formerly democratic West.
This in turn revealed ab ibnitio the fundamentally malign nature laying behind the motives of the 2030 Agenda and set the stage for a renewed ideological confrontation which over time will expose the internal contradictions of a project which at its core rejects all transcendence in the name of a Promethean aspiration which itself is doomed to fail.
