Thoughts during the plague No. 5. Nergal and Erra call us to notice the essential

Dur: 00:14:09 Download: HD Subtitles: English Français

Thoughts during the plague No. 5. Nergal and Erra call us to notice the essential

Hello, you are watching the series “Thoughts during the Plague.” Today I would like to turn to a mythological story about the gods of the plague. In the Mesopotamian tradition, such gods were Erra and Nergal. It was believed that the beginning of a pestilence, an epidemic, a cattle plague, when it reached people, was implied by a certain epiphany, the discovery of a higher deity that invaded the human world.

I would like to draw attention to this strange peculiarity: when misfortune occurs, something tragic is happening, people and animals die, rivers are poisoned, starvation, suffering, poverty come up – people associate this with God.

The ancient Jews in the monotheistic tradition believed that the originator of pestilence or plague was a single deity – Yahweh – which gave people graceful gifts and at the same time punished them when they deviated from the ways of Gods, when they forgot about the deity, became too immersed in earthly concerns. For this, the biblical God punished the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah and inflicted the Noachic deluge on them.

The origin of the plague in a polytheistic context is a certain epiphany, a manifestation of a deity that shows that a person is mortal, weak, miserable. Man already lives in a world of ashes. The gods Erra and Nergal just remind: you are dust, you are ash from ashes; your will, your pleasures, your sense of security and your joys are nothing in the face of deity. And if the deity wants, it will return you to the state of nothingness – to your ash. It is a mythological context.

Actually, the gods of the plague recall the scale of the human, which is incomparably smaller than the scale of the divine. If we pay heed to biblical stories, it turns out that the plague, epidemic, pestilence have the same function – God punishes people, demonstrating their narrow-mindedness, weakness. Actually, the epidemic of plague, cholera, and pestilence in the Middle Ages was understood in this way – despite the fact that the Christian God is virtuous and did not pity his son for the salvation of people, yet in some cases he brings people back to the right path adopting cruel pedagogy. If people do not understand in a good way, then God begins to interact with them in a rough way, showing the true path to salvation.

This interpretation of sacredness of a pest, an epidemic, a plague, a pestilence (both in Christian and pre-Christian – Jewish and even polytheistic context) – has one fundamental feature: the plague, natural disaster, catastrophe have a certain sense, and it is almost always the same: when the mankind’s humanness is overswollen, when people become too convinced of their omnipotence and almightiness, have a sense of grandeur about themselves – a deity who is at a higher level of being, consciousness, power and might, brings the humans back to their positions. You are dust, be humble. You are a servant of God, do not rebel against God. You have concluded an alliance with God (in Judaism), an union, a covenant, you must follow it, you must not rebel on a higher, spiritual, heavenly order. You must abide by certain rules (including family, political, state, hierarchical, religious). And if you say that you don’t want to know any of this, then you get the plague. One would think that the plague will have mercy on the righteous, and punish the sinners. Well no! A righteous man just doesn’t suffer too much during the plague – he is ready for death, for the service of God, he even understands why the Lord punishes humanity, and therefore sees this as a manifestation of divine justice. The righteous is strengthened in his righteousness when the gods of the plague come or when the one deity sends it.

And the therapy is directed specifically against the sinner – he thinks too highly of himself, he believes that he understands everything so well, he has such a developed science that he doesn’t need God, he can take care of himself. This is just a sinful thought – rebellion against God – and it is sent back to its bounds by the plague.

The plague has a certain meaning. The plague is a manifestation of the transcendental, divine, sacred dimension in the human world that forgets this dimension. Accordingly, if we now return to this view – to the sacredness of the plague – we can correctly interpret what is happening to us in the era of the coronavirus epidemic. Because it is the same – how do we differ from other eras? Our humanity relies on technological facilities, believes that it can calculate the genome, that it can organize the lives of billions of people on the planet according to the same liberal market logic, that humanity can do without God, without gods, without rite, without churches, without rituals, coping with any challenges only by virtue of the reason.

And here comes the coronavirus, which says – nothing of the sort! Friends, you are nobody, you are dust. You are small, dirty, weak, boorish insects that got a false idea of your own importance. Return to your proportion. Remember what the fear of the Lord is, what the scourge of God is. You sin, violate the framework assigned to you; violate the covenants that God has given you. You go beyond the bounds of humanity. You are caught up by the devil, Satan, titanism to rebel against the deity – get some: coronavirus, plague, punishment.

And this is the best of pedagogics – if you do not return again, I will destroy you, I will create another humanity, or even the world will come to an end.

This is what the divine principle of the plague means – this is the discourse of the plague, the message of the plague, the narrative of the plague: stop being those that you were, return to the path of the Lord, return to the proportion, the scale that is determined for earthly humanity. Stop, rethink your behavior.

Today, such an interpretation can be within Christian, Islamic, Jewish traditions, other religions (Buddhism, Hinduism). But the religious (in the broad sense) interpretation of the coronavirus epidemic is mostly non-mainstream. Basically, we are talking about how many masks we need, how many lung ventilators we need, how to build new clinics and what measures should be taken so that the virus does not spread further, how to save people.

Everything seems to be fine. But don’t you think that such an attitude, if you recall the gods of the plague, only aggravates our situation – we say: it’s overcomable, we can cope with it, there is no trace of God, we must rely on our strength, and we must deal with the plague by our human forces. But do we thereby aggravate our situation? Assuming the religious, metaphysical meaning of the plague, should this really be our answer? If the plague makes sense, if the pandemic wants to show that we were moving in the wrong direction, that we need to change the course and foundations of civilization, that we have gone too far in believing in the immanent, we don’t even believe in people, we believe in items, in objects, in technologies, in AI, in genomes, in a completely disembodied rational technocratic mind, which is no longer human and more and more resembles Satan and the devil.

Interestingly, Nergal - the god of the plague, the classical god of Akkadian mythology - descends to hell with the queen of hell Ereshkigal - and threatens to chop off her head. She tries to make him his captive, but he draws his sword, takes her by the hair and says - and now, swine, I will cut your throat. Then the queen of hell Ereskigal, who fell on her knees in front of the plague god Nergal, says – then I can only ask you to marry me. Akkadian stories end like this. But it is interesting that the solar god Nergal, the plague god Nergal descends to hell in order to put in place and put in order the mistress of hell who has risen against the divine order.

This is a very important myth. The plague comes for a reason, it comes for something – to make us be humble, to make our earthly, material beginning return to its rightful location in the hierarchy of being, in the hierarchy of creatures.

The plague gods teach us humility. God sends plague in monotheistic cultures so that a person remembers how insignificant and weak he is. And if we fight the plague by means of a state of emergency, a new number of masks, ventilators, only relying on doctors – then we, as Ereshkigal, say that we are not convinced – we will defeat the plague ourselves, we will not change our way of life, we will make fun and live as before, we will restore the capitalist economy, our secular values, our entertainments, our path of autonomous humanity, our research in the field of high technologies and AI, we will continue to modernize and digitalize our society, we will implant everyone during the epidemic and the quarantine with microchips, and thus overcome the plague ourselves.

Accordingly, we will simply make our doom inevitable. That's the problem. To fight – yes, to overcome the epidemic – yes, not to allow it to spread –  yes, that's right. But most importantly, if we miss the issue, why this plague, why this coronavirus – and even if we manage to cope without an internal change in our life, our society, our values, will we not make ourselves and all of humanity worse?

All the best, let's think about this message of the gods of the plague in the era of quarantine ...

Cources & cycles

Thoughts during the Plague (A.Dugin)

Thoughts during the Plague cycle of speeches.

Hello, we continue our conversations in the era of pandemics, and today I would like to talk about those indisputable consequences of coronavirus spread in the world, which, it seems to me, have already become apparent.

I am deeply convinced, and this is confirmed by most sane experts both in our country and on a global scale, that this coronavirus epidemic actually represents the end of globalization. All institutions, all mechanisms that should both have prevented the spread of the pandemic, and become immediate reaction in order to somehow localize or neutralize, or cure; all these institutions on which humanity could count and rely by default in conditions of global united world with open borders, with the ideology of human rights and with a common vision of full transparency of all societies; all this failed in a completely shamefull way.

Globalization could do nothing against coronavirus. In the beginning, the attempt to leave everything as is, not to change anything and not to respond to the virus, gave catastrophic results, and all societies, including the most open ones, the most liberal, most globalist: European and American - were eventually forced to just close their borders, implement government control, the state of emergency and actually to rush far, far away from these global institutions that have demonstrated their complete ineffectiveness, inability to respond to any problems and to delegate authority to nation states. Actually what happened in France with Macron, in the United States with Trump, in Germany with Merkel, and even with Boris Johnson in the UK is a return to nation states, imposition of the state of emergency and, as Karl Schmitt said, the state of emergency is necessarily followed by establishing dictatorship. A sovereign is the one, for Karl Schmitt, who makes decisions in emergency circumstances - Ernstfall. Coronavirus brought us the need for Ernstfall, i.e. emergency circumstances and in these emergency circumstances, the ultimate authority which make decisions, the sovereign instance are nation states and their leaders. Here we are!

In other words, as soon as globalization collided with something that represents a real threat for human lives, all spells about open borders, about technocracy, about Ilon Mask, flights to Mars, driverless Tesla cars, Greta Tunberg, all globalist projects and spells disappeared in one moment. In fact, we see how, by contrast, China is effectively acting. Why is China, which was the first victim of the pandemic spread, although, perhaps, the pandemic in other countries: USA, Europe and Italy existed before, just it wasn't detected. China turned out to be the first country where it was identified as an epidemic of coronavirus, this pandemic. And then other countries have discovered coronavirus but it’s quite obvious that the scale and the scope that the spread of coronavirus has acquired in Europe or USA means that this virus existed there for a long time, he just was not diagnosed as such. So, China, which collided to the full extent, first, in a pretty terrifying scale, with this epidemic, China coped with it only thanks to its closedness. Due to the fact that China maintained a political structure governed by the Communist Party, because it was and remains a disciplined, disciplinatory society that was instantly closed, instantly implemented isolation mode, closed Wuhan, closed other provinces, blocked people, forbade movement, imposed a state of emergency on a part of its territories, and in such a way localized the virus and suppressed it. This strict coordinated action of the Chinese model gave an example of how to work with coronavirus. And in the beginning England, Italy, Spain, France, Germany, America said: well, just not the Chinese variant, tried to ironize over the Chinese, but as soon as trouble reached Europe, then it turned out that the measures applied by the Chinese are the only effective way to fight coronavirus.

Some figures being very convinced fanatics and globalists like Giorgio Agamben or Bill Gates still try to convince us that the best way to fight coronavirus is to quickly get infected for everybody, leaving open borders, keeping completely all the system of globalism, well, in some sense it follows from this just quickly to die. Boris Johnson tried during the virus spread week in the UK also to move in this liberal-globalist direction but in that circumstances of the terrifying scale of the tragedy, very quickly rejected this, and was compelled to implement the same national isolation regime, closure of borders, isolation of people, quarantining, sa faced as well extraordinary circumstances. And now today's world is for those who wanted to close their societies, their borders and their people, wanted to impose a state of emergency and to transfer the authority to national state as the highest instance of sovereignty or didn’t want it, but still ended up in a situation of need in the face of the pandemic, since everyone around acted the same way: closed borders closed people and transferred the power from supranational authorities to national. What do we have as a result? We mean that when the epidemic started, before the spread of coronavirus, we dealt with open society, and even if this society was not completely open on worldwide scale, all elites, all leadership of all countries: Russia, and China, even Iran, to a large extent, aside from Western countries, recognized by default that we live in open society that open society is if not something accomplished, as in Europe or America, then an aim to strain after, as for other territories, and therefore in reality nobody called into question basically that anyway liberal democracy and open society is the goal to which all of humanity is moving. No one questioned this. And then the coronavirus came, and it turned out that this goal, this orientation is completely a failed one. This is a chimera that cannot respond effectively to none of the challenges with which it collided. And after that we see the total collapse of open society, because coronavirus is incompatible with open society, as far as we must choose between either coronavirus or open society. And in the beginning those who still tried to say: "Better open society and death", have lost all support because everything, absolutely everything, and even western liberal societies in which this openness has already penetrated in the depth of their unconscious and even them had to instantly break up with it, shouting: "No, if closedness is the choice of life, then we choose closed society.

Here's what happened: we see the closing of open societies and moving from transnational authorities and approaches to economic, social and political processes to national standards. In fact, welcome to the multipolar world! Coronavirus closed open society, completely eliminated the process of globalization, undermined (well, we are separately talk about it) globalist economy, and returned the peoples to national borders. And many will tell me: "Well, these are temporary measures, now everyone will cope with it, invent a vaccine, recover" ... This is a mistake. First, the epidemic will last quite a while. Even the most optimistic forecasts announce a term of six months or even of a year. Many say that it will contaminate all humanity, and there are relapses of this disease. Someone says that synchronously to this virus (firstly, we do not finally know about its consequences, how serious and terrible it can be), there may be relapses, there may be different strains, but in principle, such a precedent already gives evidence to the complete failure of the globalist project.

If a serious problem can be effectively operated by humanity solely in the context of closedness, in the context of national borders, it means that globalization has come to an end and that we enter the post-global world. Accordingly, from the ideological point of view, it is nowadays that we are experiencing a transition from an open society to a closed one, and the longer this fight will last in conditions of a closed society, and only in such conditions it can be conducted, the deeper the institutions of this post-global order will take root. We entered into the coronavirus epidemic as open society, as global world and we will come out of it as multipolar world with nation states as higher authorities of sovereignty. That's what has already done this pandemic. And day after day the irreversibility of this process will become more and more apparent. Those who believe that everything will come back, are deeply mistaken: there is no way back, totally new horizons are ahead, the new world order which is different from the previous one is ahead, naturally different from the bipolar one which collapsed in the 90s of the last century, and from the unipolar one. This multi-polar world, in which China, Russia, strong closed states - even the United States of America - can survive with state of emergency, with Trump, with the imposition of curfew time with patrols troops in American cities with closing, and actually suspension ("suspended democracy"), of democracy and temporary abrogation of civil rights and freedoms or, at least, restrictions - this regime is henceforth dominant of that world order which will take shape faster and faster day after day. So, during coronavirus we are changing one world order: open society, global system for another: for a closed society, a multipolar world with completely different priorities, other value systems and other structures of political governance.

The state of emergency, Ernstfall, it is very very serious and one who is in power in such a situation, is not likely to give it up voluntarily to anyone. This is, let's say, the positive side of the epidemic in which we now live. Of course, it’s important to deal with it, it’s important to survive, but you can’t reduce everything to solution of purely technical issues, it is essential to think about the future. And at the exit from this pandemic we will come across a completely new post-global reality.

Лекции курса:

Дополнительные материалы
Книги к курсу: